Use of Scripting languages in VLSI

Very often we come across questions from VLSI engineers that "Which scripting language should a VLSI engineer should learn?".

Well, Shell, Tcl, Perl, and Python are the scripting languages that are commonly used for VLSI front end/back end design automation and related applications. 

TCL: Tcl (pronounced "tickle" or as an initialism) is a high-level, general-purpose, interpreted, dynamic programming language

PERL: Practical Extraction and Reporting Language

PYTHON: Python is a dynamic, object-oriented, high-level programming language that can be used for many kinds of software development/scripting.

Shell Scripting: A shell script is a computer program designed to be run by the Unix/Linux shell which could be one of the following:

The Bourne Shell / The C Shell / The Korn Shell / The GNU Bourne-Again Shell

A shell is a command-line interpreter and typical operations performed by shell scripts include file manipulation, program execution, and printing text.

 

Perl has been in use for several years, but python is increasingly becoming more popular. In the past, we have already shared out views on the advantages of Python. Ref: Advantages of Python over Perl

Tcl is also used mostly for tool interfaces as several EDA tools support that.

If you know any kind of programming, learning a new scripting language will be easy.

Following are some commonly used applications of scripting languages in VLSI:

• Front end RTL/Testbench code compilation and simulation flows
• Automation of running tests in regressions, generating reports, analyzing failures, debug automation
• Connectivity checks, netlist parsing, automatic generation/modification any RTL module/stubs, etc
• Synthesis, P&R tools interfacing, and back end flow.
• Several project management utilities - regression pass rates, trends, bug charts, etc - that helps in tracking projects
• Any other task that is repetitive in workflow and can be automated.

Here is a complete comparison of TCL, PYTHON and PERL.

TCL vs PERL vs PYTHON

Advantages of Python over Perl

In the new competitive generation of chip designing where Time-to-Market is so critical and also the complexity of designs is increasing exponentially.  Adding to that it is also observed that the Verification is always considered the longest pole and takes nearly 70% of the chip design life cycle. Hence any opportunity to automate a  task that is repeatable more than once is considered of most importance to improve the verification productivity. This is where  “scripting” skills are highly valuable for any  Verification engineer.

After many years of writing design and verification automation scripts in Perl and Python, we would like to throw some light on the advantages of using Python.

Maintainability

As we all know, Perl is easy to write but hard to read, especially when someone else has written it. There are multiple ways of writing the same code. Add to this fact that many engineers take pride in writing highly obfuscated Perl that is a pain for others to read.

Maintainability is a critical aspect of any engineering project. Throwing away code and rewriting it is a productivity loss. Unfortunately, this happens a lot with Perl.

Python, on the other hand, has a clean syntax and typically there is only one way of doing what you want. Python code is hence much more readable. Even people who have never written Python code ever can understand it, as the syntax is very “pseudo-code” like. It is also easier to functionalize and modularize code in Python as the language naturally encourages this.

Re-usability

Perl is designed for use and throw. You write something in Perl, run it and then forget about it. It is very difficult to extend the functionality of a Perl script. Typically you would not have organized your code into functions, as Perl syntax does not encourage that. When you try adding some functionality to your Perl script you realize that re-writing it completely is better than re-using the earlier script and extending it.

Python syntax encourages re-usability. The mindset is different. When you write code in Python, you write with future re-usability in mind. This is really tough to do in Perl. Perl encourages shortcuts.

Scale

Writing large pieces of code (more than 50k lines) in Perl exposes the weaknesses in the language. Maintainability, performance, and packaging are big issues. Can I package my application in a way that doesn’t require users to download and install modules used by the application?

Perl encourages users to download and install modules as needed. IT departments are not comfortable with upgrading Perl installations on thousands of server farm nodes. It would be an IT nightmare.

Python distributions, on the other hand, come with a majority of the module libraries included. Also, Python allows the packaging of applications so users do not have to manually download and install all module and library dependencies needed to run an application.

Final words

Perl is great at some things. For example, it has fantastic regular expression capabilities (it can even combine multiple regexp’s and match all of them together!). Perl is a worthy successor to awk.

Bottom line:  For use and throw scripts, Perl is great. But, if your code needs to be checked into a version control system and will potentially be modified by other people, I would prefer Python over Perl.

Programming FPGAs with Python

For everyone who wants to get started with developing for FPGA’s and dont want to waste time in learning a new programming  language or they just want to use their current knowledge of programming with Python to program an FPGA, this tool is just made for you!

The Python Hardware Processsor is written in Myhdl which makes it possible to run a very small subset of python on an FPGA, it converts a very simple Python code into either VHDL or Verilog and then a hardware description can be uploaded to the FPGA:

“Due to the python nature of Myhdl and the Python Hardware Prozessor written with it, it allows you, to write a Programm for the prozessor, to simulate the Hardware Processor and to convert the Processor to a valid hardware description (VHDL or Verilog) inside a single python environment.”

MyHDL surely won’t replace VHDL or Verilog but it could be a great tool for simulation and to test the behavior of your design and it’s certainly a tool worth looking into if you want to jump into the world of FPGAs.

Feel free to discuss in the comments thread.

Get free daily email updates!

Follow us!